TheBaseballPage.com

Fred Lynn

Fred Lynn

Sonsofsamhorn

Position(s):
CF, DH, LF, OF, RF
Born:
February 3, 1952
Bats:
Left
Throws:
Left
Height:
6' 1"
Weight:
185 lbs
Major League Debut:
9-05-1974 with BOS
Allstar Selections:
1975 GG, 1975 MVP, 1975 ROOK, 1978 GG, 1979 GG, 1980 GG, 1982 ALCS, 1983 AsMVP
Y team LG POS G GS PO A E DP Fld% RF9 RFG
1974 BOS AL DH 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1974 BOS AL LF 6 6 8 2 0 0 1.00 1.750 1.670
1974 BOS AL OF 12 12 18 2 0 0 1.00 1.810 1.670
1974 BOS AL RF 2 2 4 0 0 0 1.00 2.00 2.00
1974 BOS AL CF 4 4 7 0 0 0 1.00 2.100 1.750
1975 BOS AL OF 144 140 404 11 7 1 .983 2.990 2.880
1975 BOS AL CF 144 140 404 11 7 1 .983 2.990 2.880
1976 BOS AL RF 1 1 3 0 0 0 1.00 3.380 3.00
1976 BOS AL CF 127 123 363 13 6 4 .984 3.070 2.960
1976 BOS AL DH 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1976 BOS AL OF 128 124 367 13 6 4 .984 3.080 2.970
1977 BOS AL CF 125 124 331 7 2 1 .994 2.780 2.700
1977 BOS AL DH 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1977 BOS AL OF 125 124 333 7 2 1 .994 2.800 2.720
1978 BOS AL OF 149 148 408 11 7 2 .984 2.820 2.810
1978 BOS AL CF 149 148 404 11 7 2 .983 2.790 2.790
1979 BOS AL CF 143 142 380 10 5 4 .987 2.880 2.730
1979 BOS AL DH 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1979 BOS AL OF 143 142 381 10 5 4 .987 2.890 2.730
1980 BOS AL CF 110 108 303 11 2 3 .994 2.980 2.850
1980 BOS AL OF 110 108 302 11 2 4 .994 2.970 2.850
1981 CAL AL CF 69 67 179 4 4 1 .979 2.800 2.650
1981 CAL AL OF 69 67 176 4 4 1 .978 2.750 2.610
1982 CAL AL OF 133 123 317 6 3 3 .991 2.600 2.430
1982 CAL AL CF 133 123 319 7 3 3 .991 2.630 2.450
1983 CAL AL CF 113 110 277 8 2 4 .993 2.570 2.520
1983 CAL AL DH 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1983 CAL AL OF 113 110 274 8 2 4 .993 2.540 2.500
1984 CAL AL CF 62 59 137 4 2 2 .986 2.780 2.270
1984 CAL AL OF 140 135 321 12 6 5 .982 2.490 2.380
1984 CAL AL RF 112 76 178 9 4 3 .979 2.260 1.670
1985 BAL AL CF 123 121 313 6 2 2 .994 2.740 2.590
1985 BAL AL OF 123 121 314 6 2 2 .994 2.750 2.600
1986 BAL AL CF 107 104 245 2 4 1 .984 2.440 2.310
1986 BAL AL DH 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1986 BAL AL OF 107 104 244 2 4 1 .984 2.430 2.300
1987 BAL AL OF 101 97 229 2 2 1 .991 2.480 2.290
1987 BAL AL CF 102 97 234 2 2 1 .992 2.530 2.310
1987 BAL AL DH 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1988 BAL AL RF 21 18 41 1 1 0 .977 2.480 2.00
1988 DET AL CF 3 3 7 0 0 0 1.00 3.150 2.330
1988 BAL AL CF 64 60 177 0 1 0 .994 3.140 2.770
1988 DET AL DH 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1988 BAL AL DH 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1988 DET AL LF 19 17 34 2 0 0 1.00 2.140 1.890
1988 BAL AL OF 83 78 216 1 2 0 .991 2.960 2.610
1988 DET AL OF 22 20 41 2 0 0 1.00 2.260 1.950
1989 DET AL DH 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1989 DET AL LF 68 63 119 5 1 0 .992 2.140 1.820
1989 DET AL OF 68 63 119 5 1 0 .992 2.140 1.820
1990 SDN NL LF 42 36 64 1 0 0 1.00 1.860 1.550
1990 SDN NL OF 55 49 92 1 0 0 1.00 2.020 1.690
1990 SDN NL RF 8 7 14 0 0 0 1.00 2.350 1.750
1990 SDN NL CF 6 6 13 0 0 0 1.00 2.540 2.170
This day in baseball history

August 03

  • 2006

    On August 3, 2006, Phillies' infielder Chase Utley goes 3-fo ...

  • 1989

    On August 3, 1989, the Cincinnati Reds set a major league re ...

  • 1980

    On August 3, 1980, Al Kaline, Chuck Klein, Duke Snider, and ...

More Baseball History

Sponsored Links

 
Tagged:
1975 ALCS, 1975 World Series, 1982 ALCS, AL MVP 1975, All Star, Baltimore Orioles, Boston Red Sox, California Angels, Detroit Tigers, Fred Lynn, Gold Glove, Rookie of the Year Award

Comments

  • Owais King said: I was very pleased to find this site. I wanted to thank you for this great read!! I definitely enjoying every little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you post. xarelto and uncontrolled bleeding 3:08PM 07/29/15
  • Owais King said: This site is excellent and so is how the subject matter was explained. I also like some of the comments too. Looking forward to your next post. Accident attorney 3:04PM 07/29/15
  • shiki said: Seeing http://www.ozone-aqua-centre.com/dell-perch-michael-kors-australia-outlet/ http://www.vinirolfo.it/charles-michael-kors-outlet-online-hosts/ red knowledge When french shoemaker christian louboutin tried to http://vitadicorsa.vpost.it/2015/ralph-lauren-uomo-tuta-who-also-plays/ trademark the color red used http://test.wholenessthroughchrist.org.za/all-ralph-lauren-uk-free/ on the bottom of its high fashion high heeled women shoes, a court ruling shot them down, much to the relief of french fashion rival yves saint laurent, which sells its own line of red shoes. Louboutin isn giving up, and last week, company lawyers appealed the ruling in a manhattan courtroom.Should a company be able to trademark a color in this case, louboutin red when color is http://www.beyondexcellent.asia/?p=39705 such an integral part of the fashion industry creativity? Sense is that louboutin already the red bottoms on its shoes in the minds of consumers, says wharton marketing professor patti williams, who acknowledges that she is not an expert in trademark law.Part and parcel of the brand experience they deliver, and [it's how] the brand allows consumers to tell others that they are wearing louboutin shoes.Is to prevent other brands, both high and low, from appropriating that symbol for their own benefit, she adds.I not sure i see it as that different from brown trucks for ups.I sure ups wouldn want another delivery company to paint its trucks the exact shade of brown, even if the other company didn have the ups logo on them.In addition, says williams, she would expect that a ruling in louboutin favor apply to a very specific color of red, not all colors of red.Baker retailing center, agrees that red sole on luxury shoes has clearly been identified as the brand louboutin by many consumers and i think this brand is the only one to date that has used that color on the bottom of the shoe.She speculates that the earlier court ruling have been based on consumers' identifying the brand by the color of the sole.Take on the legal issue as to whether a brand can own this kind of identification is a function of how important the to the product class vs.The brand itself.I believe, for example, that a pair of surgical gloves was allowed to own the color purple because that was associated with its brand, had not been used by any other brands before them and was not material to the product class per se.Similarly, it would be a legal issue as to whether pink is associated with pepto bismol only, or with stomach medicine in general.If that is the case, then red soles could fit that definition because it doesn appear that any other shoe company has put red on the bottom of its shoes.That red sole, therefore, become associated with that luxury brand.By lawyers for both christian louboutin and yves saint laurent revolved around a few key points, according to an article last week in the wall street journal.Louboutin has created one of the more iconic trademarks of the 21st century, stated louboutin lawyer in the journal article.Turned a pedestrian item into a thing of beauty.Article also quoted a rebuttal from yves saint laurent lawyer:Need the full palette of colors available.In order to compete and compete fairly, we need red.The company does not want to be told that it make green, blue, purple shoes but [is prevented] from making red ones. 3:13AM 06/08/15
Login or register to post comments

Stay Connected

Share |

Today's Poll

Will Red Sox Repeat in 2014:
Browse Player Profiles